Yeti, The Loch Ness Monster, Moderate Moslems
Everyone's heard of them, but no one's ever really seen one
Scroll down and you'll see a posting entitled "A German's point of view on Islam". In case you haven't been fortunate enough to read it, the gist of it is that the peace loving peoples of many nations through-out history essentially sat back and did nothing while some very nasty individuals did some even nastier deeds on behalf of the peace loving people of whatever country.
The end result-- the Russian Communists killed tens of millions in the name of the Russian people. The Nazis killed tens of millions in the name of the German People. The Chinese Communists killed tens of millions in the name of the Chinese people, The Imperial Japanese killed tens of millions in the name of the Japanese people, etc, etc.
The individual who wrote this, brilliantly stated the obvious; "Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awake one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun."
With all that said, Leo McKinstry of the (UK's) Daily Express wrote an excellent piece entitled "BRITISH MUSLIMS MUST SHOW WHICH SIDE THEY ARE ON". Here's a wee bit of the article;
Where are the marches and demonstrations, the passionate speeches and angry slogans? Where are the protesters shouting “not in my name”? Usually so quick to take to the streets at any perceived slight against their religion, all too many Muslims in Britain seem indifferent to attempted mass slaughter being carried out in the name of Islam.
When an obscure Danish newspaper published a satirical cartoon of the prophet Mohammed last year, there were such huge Muslim rallies that central London was brought to a halt on three successive weekends.
Yet the serious terrorist incidents of recent days have incurred no such heated response. In some cases, there was an outright attempt to deny Muslim responsibility. The deputy general secretary of the Muslim Council of Britain, Daud Abdullah, came out with this preposterous statement after the London bombings had been foiled: “Let’s not create a hypothetical problem. It can be the work of Muslims, Christians, Jews or Buddhists.”
What is just as sickening is that some of our key political leaders, who should be protecting our society, collude with this grotesque narrative of denial and blame-passing.So in Scotland, shortly after the assault on Glasgow airport, the new First Minister Alex Salmond claimed that “individuals, not communities” were responsible for terrorism, a piece of nonsense given that it is the Muslim community that has bred the terrorists.
In London, Mayor Ken Livingstone was even more reprehensible.He dismissed the idea of any connection between Islam and terrorism, claiming that: “Muslims are less likely to support the use of violence to achieve political ends than non-Muslims.” Yeah, right, tell that to the relatives of those killed in the July bombings, or the Twin Towers, or the Bali attacks or the Madrid massacre.Or tell it to your own Metropolitan Police, which says there are at least 2,000 Muslims in Britain linked directly to Al Qaeda. Then Livingstone sought to excuse the bombers by referring to the war in Iraq and to levels of unemployment among young Muslims, both of which had left them alienated from our society.
As Neil Cavuto of Fox News pointed out today, "they want us dead simply because we breath". Oh, sure... there'll be the anomaly here and there. Someone named Mohammed or Ahmed will have the guts to stand up and say something. But take my word for it... they really are the one in a million.
The millions and millions of "peace loving" moslems have already chosen which side they're on. You'll see them tonight when you watch the news. From Rabat to Jakarta, from London to Los Angeles, millions of moslems have taken to the streets to state definitively and without question; "NOT IN MY NAME!!"
Oh, wait... no they didn't.
Everyone's heard of them, but no one's ever really seen one
Scroll down and you'll see a posting entitled "A German's point of view on Islam". In case you haven't been fortunate enough to read it, the gist of it is that the peace loving peoples of many nations through-out history essentially sat back and did nothing while some very nasty individuals did some even nastier deeds on behalf of the peace loving people of whatever country.
The end result-- the Russian Communists killed tens of millions in the name of the Russian people. The Nazis killed tens of millions in the name of the German People. The Chinese Communists killed tens of millions in the name of the Chinese people, The Imperial Japanese killed tens of millions in the name of the Japanese people, etc, etc.
The individual who wrote this, brilliantly stated the obvious; "Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awake one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun."
With all that said, Leo McKinstry of the (UK's) Daily Express wrote an excellent piece entitled "BRITISH MUSLIMS MUST SHOW WHICH SIDE THEY ARE ON". Here's a wee bit of the article;
Where are the marches and demonstrations, the passionate speeches and angry slogans? Where are the protesters shouting “not in my name”? Usually so quick to take to the streets at any perceived slight against their religion, all too many Muslims in Britain seem indifferent to attempted mass slaughter being carried out in the name of Islam.
When an obscure Danish newspaper published a satirical cartoon of the prophet Mohammed last year, there were such huge Muslim rallies that central London was brought to a halt on three successive weekends.
Yet the serious terrorist incidents of recent days have incurred no such heated response. In some cases, there was an outright attempt to deny Muslim responsibility. The deputy general secretary of the Muslim Council of Britain, Daud Abdullah, came out with this preposterous statement after the London bombings had been foiled: “Let’s not create a hypothetical problem. It can be the work of Muslims, Christians, Jews or Buddhists.”
What is just as sickening is that some of our key political leaders, who should be protecting our society, collude with this grotesque narrative of denial and blame-passing.So in Scotland, shortly after the assault on Glasgow airport, the new First Minister Alex Salmond claimed that “individuals, not communities” were responsible for terrorism, a piece of nonsense given that it is the Muslim community that has bred the terrorists.
In London, Mayor Ken Livingstone was even more reprehensible.He dismissed the idea of any connection between Islam and terrorism, claiming that: “Muslims are less likely to support the use of violence to achieve political ends than non-Muslims.” Yeah, right, tell that to the relatives of those killed in the July bombings, or the Twin Towers, or the Bali attacks or the Madrid massacre.Or tell it to your own Metropolitan Police, which says there are at least 2,000 Muslims in Britain linked directly to Al Qaeda. Then Livingstone sought to excuse the bombers by referring to the war in Iraq and to levels of unemployment among young Muslims, both of which had left them alienated from our society.
As Neil Cavuto of Fox News pointed out today, "they want us dead simply because we breath". Oh, sure... there'll be the anomaly here and there. Someone named Mohammed or Ahmed will have the guts to stand up and say something. But take my word for it... they really are the one in a million.
The millions and millions of "peace loving" moslems have already chosen which side they're on. You'll see them tonight when you watch the news. From Rabat to Jakarta, from London to Los Angeles, millions of moslems have taken to the streets to state definitively and without question; "NOT IN MY NAME!!"
Oh, wait... no they didn't.
posted by Kevin Whiteman at
5:53 PM
2 Comments:
Let's recite the Mel Gibson prayer for Ecumenical Unity that he ad libbed in the movie "We were soldiers": "One more thing, Dear Lord about our enemies: Ignore their heathen prayers and help us blow those little bastards straight to Hell!"
(He said it in the Chapel before being deployed)
Warning! Those infected with the false spirit of Vatican II will have a violent reaction to the following truth:
Here's what the Angelic Doctor, St. Thomas Aquinas, said about Islam's inventor.
"He (Mohammed) seduced the people by promises of carnal pleasure to which the concupiscence of the flesh urges us. His teaching also contained precepts that were in conformity with his promises, and he gave free rein to carnal pleasure. In all this, as is not unexpected; he was obeyed by carnal men. As for proofs of the truth of his doctrine, he brought forward only such as could be grasped by the natural ability of anyone with a very modest wisdom. Indeed, the truths that he taught he mingled with many fables and with doctrines of the greatest falsity.
He did not bring forth any signs produced in a supernatural way, which alone fittingly gives witness to divine inspiration; for a visible action that can be only divine reveals an invisibly inspired teacher of truth. On the Contrary, Mohammed said that he was sent in the power of his arms - which are signs not lacking even to robbers and tyrants. What is more, no wise men, men trained in things divine and human, believed in him from the beginning. Those who believed in him were brutal men and desert wanderers, utterly ignorant of all divine teaching, through whose numbers Mohammed forced others to become his follower's by the violence of his arms. Nor do divine pronouncements on part of preceding prophets offer him any witness. On the contrary, he perverts almost all the testimony of the Old and the New Testaments by making them into a fabrication of his own, as can be seen by anyone who examines his law. It was, therefore, a shrewd decision on his part to forbid his followers to read the Old and New Testaments, lest these books convict him of falsity. It is thus clear that those who place faith in his words believe foolishly." - from Summa Contra Gentiles, Book 1, Chapter 16, Art. 4.
(found here: http://www.opusdeialert.com/st-thomas-aquinas-against-mohammed.htm)
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home