"Mrs. Clinton, Choose Either Our Lady of Guadalupe Or Margaret Sanger" ~
Congressman Christopher Smith (R-NJ)
Text from the Catholic News Agency; (Emphasis mine)“In her remarks, Secretary Clinton said she was ‘in awe’ --I repeat, ‘in awe’-- of Margaret Sanger, the founder of Planned Parenthood.”
“To our distinguished Secretary of State, I respectfully ask: Are you kidding? In ‘awe’ of Margaret Sanger, who said in 1921, ‘Eugenics…is the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political, and social problems’ and who also said in 1922, ‘The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it’?” asked Congressman Smith.
He went on to say that Secretary Clinton in her speech said that Margaret Sanger's “life and leadership” was “one of the most transformational in the entire history of the human race.”
Congressman Christopher Smith (R-NJ)
Text from the Catholic News Agency; (Emphasis mine)
“To our distinguished Secretary of State, I respectfully ask: Are you kidding? In ‘awe’ of Margaret Sanger, who said in 1921, ‘Eugenics…is the most adequate and thorough avenue to the solution of racial, political, and social problems’ and who also said in 1922, ‘The most merciful thing that a family does to one of its infant members is to kill it’?” asked Congressman Smith.
He went on to say that Secretary Clinton in her speech said that Margaret Sanger's “life and leadership” was “one of the most transformational in the entire history of the human race.”
1 Comments:
Lady Clinton is in awe of only one person and that is the one she sees in the mirror.
But nothing she says should surprise anyone. She is a democrat. The definition of a democrat is one that belongs to a party that since its founding has believed that other human beings are not quite human and so deserving of being terrorized, enslaved, lynched, denied rights as citizens, denied life and even allowed to be butchered as babies. If you did not believe that the black was 3/5th human for over a century and a half you could not be a democrat. If you did not support the enslavement, beating, and lyncing of the black race you could not be a democrat. If were a member of the KKK from 1965 to 1964, you were a democrat. If you filibustered to stop any civil rights laws, you were a democrat. When they lost eh war on 3/5ths black race, they found a new human that was not quite human enough for their support, the baby from conception to birth. They had a new cause and off they went only this time it was not to deny them rights, but to kill them so there could be no debate. No method was beyond their taste as they lined up to support partial birth and even leaving the baby to die if it survived the murder attempt of abortion.
Ku Klux Klan was founded in 1866 by Democrats as a Tennessee social club; the Ku Klux Klan became a military force serving the interests of the Democratic Party, and spread into other Southern states, launching a 'reign of terror' blacks that continued to the 1960's.
Hayes-Tilden Compromise of 1877 was an attempt by Republicans to get the Democrats to stop lynching blacks and respect the rights of blacks was blocked by the Democratic party. FDR knew of the lynching of blacks and his wife asked him to stop it but he refused because it was clearly his own party that would have to be stopped and cost him power.
The Democratic Party supported the "Plessy v. Ferguson" decision in 1896 that established the "separate but equal" segregation doctrine because they still saw the black as 3/5th human. And so it continued through history even to today when the overwhelming largest numbers of babies killed are black, now done by their own mothers with help and support of the good old Democratic party.
So why wouldn't this biddy support the policies of Sanger for they are the lifetime policies of her party.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home