Saturday, November 08, 2008

Who Dat Man!!??
At boy t'ink ju's lahk me, t'rough an' t'rough!

I remember watching the 2004 Democratic Convention, and the big buzz of the day was this charismatic speaker from the Illinois Senate that just simply sent tingles up the legs of every Left-Wing whackado on planet earth. And as we all know, that certain charismatic speaker from the Illinois Senate was one Barack Hussein Obama.

So is it too early for me to get fired-up over someone in 2012? Why not? Especially in light that the GOP just got their asses handed to them on every level... and I mean handed to 'em on Biblical proportions. Literally and figuratively, we just got our butts whipped by the jawbone of an Ass.

Anyhow, here are a few stats that I'd like you to take a gander at and see if these opinions match yours. I know damn good and well they don't jive with much that the now bleeding profusely "moderates" in the Republican Party espouse.

By the way, I realize that this is somewhat of a long posting, but take the few minuites... it's worth it. ~ "I'm pro-life." (Jun 2008)
~ Voted NO on expanding research to more embryonic stem cell lines. (Jan 2007)
~ Voted NO on allowing human embryonic stem cell research. (May 2005)
~ Voted YES on restricting interstate transport of minors to get abortions. (Apr 2005)
~ Rated 100% by the NRLC (National Right To Life Committee), indicating a pro-life stance. (Dec 2006)
~ Prohibit transporting minors across state lines for abortion. (Jan 2008)

~ Supports constitutional amendment to define marriage. (Jun 2008)
~ Voted YES on Constitutionally defining marriage as one-man-one-woman. (Jul 2006)
~ Voted YES on making the PATRIOT Act permanent. (Dec 2005)
~ Rated 0% by the HRC, indicating an anti-gay-rights stance. (Dec 2006)
~ Rated 33% by the NAACP, indicating an anti-affirmative-action stance. (Dec 2006)

~ Voted YES on allowing stockholder voting on executive compensation. (Apr 2007)

~ Capital punishment for rape as well as murder. (Jun 2008)
~ Voted YES on expanding services for offendors' re-entry into society. (Nov 2007)

~ Rated -10 by NORML, indicating a "hard-on-drugs" stance. (Dec 2006)

~ Tax deductions for tuition & qualified educational expenses. (Mar 2008)
~ Voted NO on allowing Courts to decide on "God" in Pledge of Allegiance. (Jul 2006)
~ Voted NO on $84 million in grants for Black and Hispanic colleges. (Mar 2006)

~ Voted YES on criminalizing oil cartels like OPEC. (May 2007)
~ Voted NO on removing oil & gas exploration subsidies. (Jan 2007)
~ Voted NO on keeping moratorium on drilling for oil offshore. (Jun 2006)
~ Voted YES on scheduling permitting for new oil refineries. (Jun 2006)
~ Voted YES on authorizing construction of new oil refineries. (Oct 2005)
~ Rated 0% by the CAF, indicating opposition to energy independence. (Dec 2006)

~ Voted YES on deterring foreign arms transfers to China. (Jul 2005)
~ Voted YES on reforming the UN by restricting US funding. (Jun 2005)

~ Voted NO on implementing CAFTA, Central America Free Trade. (Jul 2005)

~ Legislator salary increase should be smaller & post-election. (Jun 2008)
~ Voted YES on requiring lobbyist disclosure of bundled donations. (May 2007)
~ Voted NO on granting Washington DC an Electoral vote & vote in Congress. (Apr 2007)
~ Voted YES on protecting whistleblowers from employer recrimination. (Mar 2007)
~ Voted YES on requiring photo ID for voting in federal elections. (Sep 2006)
~ Voted YES on restricting independent grassroots political committees. (Apr 2006)
~ Voted YES on prohibiting lawsuits about obesity against food providers. (Oct 2005)
~ Voted YES on limiting attorney's fees in class action lawsuits. (Feb 2005)

~ Voted YES on prohibiting product misuse lawsuits on gun manufacturers. (Oct 2005)
~ Ban gun registration & trigger lock law in Washington DC. (Mar 2007)

~ Voted NO on requiring negotiated Rx prices for Medicare part D. (Jan 2007)
~ Voted YES on denying non-emergency treatment for lack of Medicare co-pay. (Feb 2006)
~ Improve services for people with autism & their families. (Apr 2007)
~ Establish a national childhood cancer database. (Mar 2007)

~ Voted YES on restricting no-bid defense contracts. (Mar 2007)
~ Voted YES on allowing electronic surveillance without a warrant. (Sep 2006)
~ Voted YES on continuing intelligence gathering without civil oversight. (Apr 2006)
~ Voted YES on federalizing rules for driver licenses to hinder terrorists. (Feb 2005)
~ Voted YES on continuing military recruitment on college campuses. (Feb 2005)

~ Voted YES on building a fence along the Mexican border. (Sep 2006)
~ Voted YES on preventing tipping off Mexicans about Minuteman Project. (Jun 2006)
~ Rated 100% by USBC, indicating a sealed-border stance. (Dec 2006)
~ Government services in English only. (Mar 2008)
~ Declare English as the official language of the US. (Feb 2007)

~ Revamp our workforce training programs. (Mar 2008)
~ Voted NO on restricting employer interference in union organizing. (Mar 2007)
~ Voted YES on increasing minimum wage to $7.25. (Jan 2007)

~ Federal tax rebate should be exempted from state income tax. (Mar 2008)
~ Eliminate the permanent tax on business utilities. (Mar 2008)
~ Speed up the elimination of the tax on capital debt. (Mar 2008)
~ Use vehicle taxes & license fees for transportation expenses. (Mar 2008)
~ Make the 2001 and 2003 Bush tax cuts permanent. (Nov 2004)
~ Voted YES on retaining reduced taxes on capital gains & dividends. (Dec 2005)
~ Rated 0% by the CTJ, indicating opposition to progressive taxation. (Dec 2006)

~ Prevent the proliferation of Weapons of Mass Destruction. (Nov 2004)
~ Voted NO on redeploying US troops out of Iraq starting in 90 days. (May 2007)
~ Voted YES on declaring Iraq part of War on Terror with no exit date. (Jun 2006)
I swear --- 99% of what I just read, I agree with --- STRONGLY!

So who is this Populist Reagan-Republican that has already been identified in the national media as one of the "rising stars" in the GOP? Hey... I've posted about him before. So those of you who frequent The Lair already know who I'm talking about.

And besides... he's a good Catholic boy!

Ladies and gents, Governor Piyush "Bobby" Jindal (R-LA)

9 Comments:

Blogger the Egyptian said...

contrary to the cnnabccbsmsnbc crowd I was rooting for Jindal from the get go, however I now believe a Palin-Jindal or Jindal-Palin ticket would be the way to go, lets see the msn pull a racist, sexist line on that one, time to burn the heretics and RINOs and get down to the basics

8:35 AM  
Blogger PreVat2 said...

I've been watching him for some time. I think the Right might just have found their Knight to carry the sword against the DNC.

Now if we can just get rid of the neo-con McCain types from the Republican Party and return her back to the era of Reagan and Teddy....then we might just have a chance in 2012.

8:48 AM  
Blogger The Digital Hairshirt said...

Thank you, Kevin, I am going to keep this guy on my radar, to be sure and I want more people to hear about him.

Palin/Jindal 2012.

'Course, one more thing these two folks have in common - with her coming from Alaska and him coming from Louisiana, ain't NUTHIN' they wouldn't consider eating!

9:29 AM  
Blogger Former Altar Boy said...

I love Sarah Palin, but I'll be amazed if she puts her family thru that torture again.

2:33 PM  
Blogger Smiley said...

He is a Catholic convert form India :) warms my heart.

7:57 PM  
Blogger Lola said...

Hot Diggity! We sure could use another Southern Govenor. They seem so darn likeable.

Let's make it an even two:

Jindal/Huckabee

(Just don't tell Stephen Colbert.)

10:35 PM  
Blogger Al said...

I was listening to Jindal on talk radio Friday & the more I hear, the more I like.

Having just become governor of Louisiana, this was not his year to run. But, if he does as good a job governing as I think he will, look out. I think he will make a formidible candidate as well as a great president.

Let's see how the PC left takes him on. They showed the emptiness of radical feminism with how the treated Palin. No lets see the truth of how non-racist they really are.

1:51 AM  
Blogger Arkanabar T'verrick Ilarsadin said...

Palin and Jindal would be an unbalanced ticket, to be sure, but it worked for Clinton/Gore.

ANY Republican candidate for President can expect the sort of treatment that Gov. Palin received this last election cycle. I am not the only one who seems to think that she, and her family, have the will and the fortitude to withstand another presidential election: see this Eugene Robinson column.

1:46 PM  
Blogger Trubador said...

And he's only 39 years old (or 37... I hear conflicting accounts). He's got a full 30 years of political life ahead of him. Even if he's not on the ticket in 2012, he could easily attempt to run in any number of elections from 2012 through to 2036. (although a Palin/Jindal or Jindal/Palin match-up in 2012 is my dream team... with she having the VP run experience plus a potential six years as AK gov., and him with a potential five years as LA gov.)

Keep an eye out also for the new CA Rep. Tom McClintock, current IN Rep. Mike Pence and GOPAC head Michael Steele.

8:47 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home