Wednesday, January 16, 2008

And We Should Be Surprised...
Why?

Here's some of the article from Life Site News;

ACLU Backs Gay Sex in Public Toilets under "Privacy" Provisions
By Hilary White

MINNEAPOLIS, January 16, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The American Civil Liberties Union is arguing that men who have sex in public washrooms should be protected under court rulings guaranteeing privacy.

On Tuesday, the ACLU filed an amicus brief to the Minnesota 4th District Court citing a Minnesota Supreme Court ruling 38 years ago that found that people who have sex in closed stalls in public restrooms "have a reasonable expectation of privacy."
Homosexual anal sex whilst negotiating one's way around the cramped confines of a tiolet stall... how fitting. After all, would you expect any less from individuals who consider the odor of fecal matter to be an aphrodisiac?

In an unrelated story, here's some of this this gem; (emphasis mine)

Highly Infectious, Deadly Bacteria Striking Gay Men
Disease spread primarily through anal intercourse
By Matthew Cullinan Hoffman

SAN FRANCISCO, January 15, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - A new medical study appearing in the Annals of American Medicine shows that
homosexuals are spreading a new, highly-infectious and extremely dangerous bacteria amongst themselves, most probably through anal intercourse.

The bacterium, called MRSA USA300, is impervious to front-line antibiotics and can only be treated with rarer drugs, primarily Vancomycin. Researchers say that the bug, which is a type of staphylococcus, is primed to develop immunity to that drug as well.

The study's authors note that the strong link between unhealthy behavior, particularly among homosexuals, is the driving force behind the disease. "Spread of the USA300 clone among men who have sex with men is associated with high-risk behaviors, including use of methamphetamine and other illicit drugs, sex with multiple partners, participation in a group sex party, use of the internet for sexual contacts, skin-abrading sex, and history of sexually transmitted infections," the authors write.

The study, which focused on clinics in the San Francisco area, found that in some cases up to 39% of patients had the MRSA USA300 infections in their genitals or buttocks, although the disease can be spread by general skin-to-skin contact
and can even be picked up from surfaces.

Observing that "Infection with multidrug-resistant USA300 MRSA is common among men who have sex with men," the study timidly concludes that "multidrug-resistant MRSA infection might be sexually transmitted in this population," and counsels "further research."

It is estimated that in San Francisco's Castro District, which has the highest concentration of homosexuals in the country, the infection rate is 1 in every 588 residents. One in every 3,800 residents of San Francisco are infected.
Homosexuals are 13 times more likely to be infected than others in the city.

Peter LaBarbara, president of Americans for Truth About Homosexuality, is hoping that the revelation of yet another homosexual epidemic will have an impact on the public's perception of homosexual behavior. "I think that the media, and Hollywood, and a lot of our policy makers and certainly academia are in a world of 'let's pretend' with regard to homosexual behavior and its consequences," he told LifeSiteNews. "They don't want to focus on the special risks that homosexual behavior, especially between men, have in the public health arena, and issues like this keep coming up."

However, LaBarbara acknowledges that the major media will
"invariably spin things in a homosexual direction."

"We saw the identical thing happen 25 years ago with the reporting on AIDS," he said, "but ironically the whole AIDS crisis strengthened the homosexual lobby in this country."
God will not be mocked.

5 Comments:

Blogger Vir Speluncae Orthodoxae said...

This is why one must not commit buggery.

7:16 PM  
Blogger ignorant redneck said...

Of course--there is not *real* connectin between having your anus or genitals rot away due to a hither too relativly rare microbe, and the fact you and your pizzo's been doin the nasty in restroom stalls.

Why are we not allowed, in civilized discourse, to address real causes instead of cower from the wrath of 1.5-3% of the male population?

12:50 PM  
Blogger PaulaB52 said...

MRSA is a scary infection. A few months ago, it was in an elementary school in my area, then in a highschool lockerroom. A couple of kids came down with the infection. Luckily, and Thank God, they were able to be treated and lived.

4:32 PM  
Blogger USMC 9971 said...

I linked to this post in one that I have on my blog regarding the nanny state.

Interesting, isn't it, that personal rights and choices can be usurped by the states on the basis of public health and safety when smoking or trans fats are the issue? Yet it is likely that the only action by California (or any other government entity) on this matter will be to call for greater funding for sex ed, free condoms, and needle exchange programs.

1:18 AM  
Blogger M. Alexander said...

I saw this headline and thought- it's hard to be too upset about this. But we all know what the solution is- through pedophilia and blood donation the sodomites will make sure that women and blonde children also get this in order to exhort science to find a cure and allow them to continue in their self destruction.

5:58 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home