"I Love My Dead Gay Son!" ~
Mark Carlton in the film Heathers
I'm just a simple retired enlisted Marine with a simple college edjumacation. I needs some help figgerin' this one out. I thought homersexuals were "born" that way? Guess not. Looks like sodomy is as sodomy does.
Here's some of the article from WorldNetDaily.com; (Emphasis mine)'Gay' family kids 7 times more likely to be homosexual
But report shows researchers concealing information
A licensed psychologist with both clinical and forensic practice outreaches is warning that it appears children of homosexual couples are seven times more likely to develop "non-heterosexual preferences" than other children, but lawmakers establishing policy often don't know that because the researchers have concealed their discoveries.
The "studies thus far find that between 8 percent and 21 percent of homosexually parented children ultimately identify as non-heterosexual," the psychologist wrote. "For comparison purposes, approximately 2 percent of the general population are non-heterosexual. Therefore, if these percentages continue to hold true, children of homosexuals have a 4 to 10 times greater likelihood of developing a non-heterosexual preference than other children." With all that said, I'd like to remind those that haven't read it, of a fairly older post (and graphic) where I pointed out the truth behind the homosexual act itself -- I've also linked to this article from CatholicEducation.org that uses medical terminology, but still paints a very disturbing picture of the results of the homosexual act. Everything from anal cancer being 10 times greater in homosexuals than heterosexuals, to parasitic infections due to oral-anal contact, to the colon actually "falling out" of the rectum because it has been, in essence, turned inside-out. Golly gee... loooks to me that when the Vatican stated that gay adoption would "destroy's the child's future" and is "an act of moral violence against the child", they were right.
Amazing, huh?
Mark Carlton in the film Heathers
I'm just a simple retired enlisted Marine with a simple college edjumacation. I needs some help figgerin' this one out. I thought homersexuals were "born" that way? Guess not. Looks like sodomy is as sodomy does.
Here's some of the article from WorldNetDaily.com; (Emphasis mine)
But report shows researchers concealing information
A licensed psychologist with both clinical and forensic practice outreaches is warning that it appears children of homosexual couples are seven times more likely to develop "non-heterosexual preferences" than other children, but lawmakers establishing policy often don't know that because the researchers have concealed their discoveries.
The "studies thus far find that between 8 percent and 21 percent of homosexually parented children ultimately identify as non-heterosexual," the psychologist wrote. "For comparison purposes, approximately 2 percent of the general population are non-heterosexual. Therefore, if these percentages continue to hold true, children of homosexuals have a 4 to 10 times greater likelihood of developing a non-heterosexual preference than other children."
Amazing, huh?
6 Comments:
Gosh, you mean children actually learn from their parents' behavior more than their speeches? Who woulda thunk it?
/sarc
BTW, these are not parents. They are babysitters, and the kids always come out shortchanged.
A "non-heterosexual preference" simply means what I've known all along - they'll come to believe that getting sexual pleasure any old way they want is A ok. We used to call that being amoral. Opposite sex not available why just hook up with what ever is handy?...
Yeah what a shock. Remember that old PSA about parents who use drugs have kids who use drugs? Well butt-piracy also begets butt-piracy.
I just told Mrs. Chestertonian, "This means children in same-sex-parent households are more likely to be gay."
Then I said, "Oh my God I can't believe I just said that -- 'same-sex-parent household.'"
She lit a cigarette. I chugged beer. 'Nuff said.
Gee, if the Vatican is right when it says that gay adoption would "destroy's the child's future" and is "an act of moral violence against the child",then the Pope must be right about condoms as well.
Not amazing to me. Only to those who reject the Church's teaching. The rest of us know better.
The article doesn't say adopted children, from what I can see.
Perhaps it is hereditary, and thus it would make more sense.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home