Dirty Secret No. 1 in Obamacareby Chuck Norris
Helmet tip to FAB.
I've never been a fan of his movies or TV show, but I sure am a fan of this particular article. Here's some of it from TownHall.com; (Emphasis and photos mine.)
Health care reforms are turning into health care revolts. Americans are turning up the heat on congressmen in town hall meetings across the U.S.
While watching these political hot August nights, I decided to research the reasons so many are opposed to Obamacare to separate the facts from the fantasy. What I discovered is that there are indeed dirty little secrets buried deep within the 1,000-plus page health care bill
It's outlined in sections 440 and 1904 of the House bill (Page 838), under the heading "home visitation programs for families with young children and families expecting children." The programs (provided via grants to states) would educate parents on child behavior and parenting skills.
Are we to assume the state's mediators would understand every parent's social or religious core values on parenting? Or would they teach some secular-progressive and religiously neutered version of parental values and wisdom? And if they were to consult and coach those who expect babies, would they ever decide circumstances to be not beneficial for the children and encourage abortions?
posted by Kevin Whiteman at
6:51 AM
3 Comments:
That is AWFUL!!! I mean, it's bad enough that DSS is supposed to help abused children and they leave kids like my childhood friend who are sexually/physically abused by their parents in the home (and that family moved from state to state, running from abuse rumors...I never saw her again). But now they're going to step in from the beginning and tell US how to raise our kids in accordance with the new government religion of Obama-love?! NO!!
The bill says that the government agents, "well-trained and competent staff," . . . .
Let's just say for the sake of argument that the bill's writers and their sponsor (i.e., His Nibs) sincerely want to put together something that would really be helpful. Well, the above quote doesn't do it. In my opinion, the Fed Gov't bureaucracy and its agents are largely incompetent, not necessarily because the individuals are incompetent (though too many are), but because the system cannot work efficiently. It hasn't been designed to be so.
Just my 2 cents (that will be inflated to $2 million to pay the Gov't's bills) worth!
It is already implemented. Some school districts are paid money by federal govt's no child left alone ... I mean, no child's behind left ... no wait ... now I remember, it's the no child left behind program. This program pays for tutors to gather children after school and teach them what they didn't pay attention to in school ... also likely is that some tutoring programs go into the home for one of one sessions with the children. Easy to imagine the govt expanding the role of the tutor to include behavior management etc. Of course, as in dog training, not only the dog but the owner receives the training. No doubt special buttons will be dispensed to parent and child so as to identify them to the govt specialist who arrives to bring them into the XXIst century.
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home