One Terrorist Turn Deserves Another
Their rationale works both ways
I ran across an interesting article in The American Thinker. Much of the stuff I agree with, such as The South-Side Stooge is a world class dolt for even having the trial in NYC. But I very much disagree with the gist of it.
I'll tell you why at the end of this posting. In the meantime, here's some of the article in question;
Terrorist Criminal Trials and the Coming Jihad
Terrorist trials in the media capital of the world will be a magnet for the inspired publicity of jihadism. All terrorism finds its inspiration in violence as theater. The theater in the courtroom will be overshadowed by the inevitable carnage in the streets.
It is inconceivable that the jihadists will not find New York during the terrorist criminal trials a place for statements to be written in blood and punctuated by explosions.
Innocent blood will flow in the streets of New York because Obama chose to make a political statement rather than confront the reality of what terrorism is and how it works. Many on the Left stated during the liberation of Iraq, that the United States was creating jihaadists. Much like the author of this article warns that the upcoming trial with cause terror attacks on NYC.
I disagree on both counts.
During the Iraqi liberation, of course terrorists came out of the woodwork. What do you think they would have done right after 9-11? Quietly remain at home and just sharpen their knives, screw the camels and beat their wives? Of course not.
And just like the latest example of the imbecile who currently resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue gives us, I've got news for you... the second attack on New Your isn't simply inevitable, it was planned out way before 9-11. As I said on September 12, the next attack isn't a question of if, it's a question of when.
Sooooo... what do the liberation of Iraq and the NY terror trials have in common? The act themselves aren't the reasons for terrorist to fall out of the sky and start killing people.
After all, terrorists don't need a reason, just an excuse.
Their rationale works both ways
I ran across an interesting article in The American Thinker. Much of the stuff I agree with, such as The South-Side Stooge is a world class dolt for even having the trial in NYC. But I very much disagree with the gist of it.
I'll tell you why at the end of this posting. In the meantime, here's some of the article in question;
Terrorist trials in the media capital of the world will be a magnet for the inspired publicity of jihadism. All terrorism finds its inspiration in violence as theater. The theater in the courtroom will be overshadowed by the inevitable carnage in the streets.
It is inconceivable that the jihadists will not find New York during the terrorist criminal trials a place for statements to be written in blood and punctuated by explosions.
Innocent blood will flow in the streets of New York because Obama chose to make a political statement rather than confront the reality of what terrorism is and how it works.
I disagree on both counts.
During the Iraqi liberation, of course terrorists came out of the woodwork. What do you think they would have done right after 9-11? Quietly remain at home and just sharpen their knives, screw the camels and beat their wives? Of course not.
And just like the latest example of the imbecile who currently resides at 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue gives us, I've got news for you... the second attack on New Your isn't simply inevitable, it was planned out way before 9-11. As I said on September 12, the next attack isn't a question of if, it's a question of when.
Sooooo... what do the liberation of Iraq and the NY terror trials have in common? The act themselves aren't the reasons for terrorist to fall out of the sky and start killing people.
After all, terrorists don't need a reason, just an excuse.
posted by Kevin Whiteman at
4:54 PM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home