Friday, January 16, 2009

Chalk One Up For The Baptists
When your right... your right

If only more of our own bishops had this guys guts. This article is somewhat of a long read... but worth it. Here's the entire article from LifeSiteNews.com; The Idol of Our Many Understandings – Bishop Gene Robinson at Prayer
Commentary by Albert Mohler, President of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary

January 14, 2009 (LifeSiteNews.com) - President-elect Barack Obama promised to make his inaugural events the most inclusive ever -- and he is making good on his promise. Just over two weeks after gay rights activists condemned his choice of Saddleback pastor Rick Warren to deliver the invocation at the ceremony itself, the President-elect and his inaugural committee announced the choice of Bishop Gene Robinson, the openly-homosexual Episcopal Bishop of New Hampshire, to open the mass event at the Lincoln Memorial with prayer.

Predictably, the committee insisted that the invitation has nothing to do with the furor over naming Warren, who angered homosexual activists and their allies by supporting Proposition 8 in California. "They called up and said this has actually been in the works for a long time," the bishop told The New York Times. He added that the committee also expressed, "and at the same time, we understand that people in the [lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender] community have been somewhat wounded by this choice, and it's our hope that your selection will go a long way to heal these divides."

The event Bishop Robinson will open with prayer will be a huge opening rally featuring major entertainment figures and a mass gathering on the mall. Artists invited to perform at the event include Bono, Stevie Wonder, and Bruce Springsteen, along with the Gay Men's Chorus of Washington.

The choice of Bishop Robinson is not a complete surprise, since the President-elect had met with the bishop during the campaign. Of course, Bishop Robinson is one of the most controversial figures in the entire history of the Episcopal Church. Controversy over his election has led to a schism in his church and a rupture that threatens to unravel the world-wide Anglican Communion.

One interesting facet of the controversies over Warren and Robinson is the fact that the inclusion of the one does not placate the critics of the other. Homosexual activists are still angry over the choice of Warren to deliver the invocation on January 20. A host of others will be offended by the choice of Bishop Robinson. These two responses illustrate the depth of the divide over the issue of homosexuality. The question cuts to the heart of issues including biblical authority and the very nature of humanity. Representation is undoubtedly symbolic, but Rick Warren and Gene Robinson represent radically divergent worldviews and incommensurate goals. They are not two very different representatives of one religion. They are instead two very symbolic representatives of two very different religions.

That point is made clear courtesy of Bishop Robinson. Consider this section of the report in The New York Times:

"Bishop Robinson said he had been reading inaugural prayers through history and was 'horrified' at how 'specifically and aggressively Christian they were.'

"'I am very clear,' he said, 'that this will not be a Christian prayer, and I won’t be quoting Scripture or anything like that. The texts that I hold as sacred are not sacred texts for all Americans, and I want all people to feel that this is their prayer.'

"Bishop Robinson said he might address the prayer to 'the God of our many understandings,' language that he said he learned from the 12-step program he attended for his alcohol addiction."


Keep in mind that this man is the Bishop of New Hampshire for the Episcopal Church. He is "horrified" by the character of previous inaugural prayers as "specifically and aggressively Christian."

We can be fairly sure that, for Bishop Robinson, "specifically" and "aggressively" mean more or less the same thing. A review of most recent inaugural prayers reveals virtually nothing that could be fairly described as "aggressive" and remarkably little that can be described as "specific." The last two inaugurations have included prayers with greater specificity, to be sure.

The bishop's comments reveal just about everything one needs to know about his theology. He pledges that "this will not be a Christian prayer" and he "won't be quoting Scripture or anything like that." No, nothing like that.

Recent controversies over praying in the name of Jesus Christ will not be a factor here. Instead, the bishop said he might address his prayer to "the God of our many understandings" -- an expression calculated to be vague. Bishop Robinson says that he learned the language in a 12-step program he attended after developing an alcohol addiction.

"The crisis in the Church of England," wrote Clive James in The Dreaming Swimmer, "is that too many of its bishops, and some would say of its archbishops, don't quite realize that they are atheists, but have begun to suspect it."

The "God of our many understandings" is a confused composite -- a very postmodern idol. Clive James is quite right about the theological crisis of unbelieving bishops - but you need go no farther than New Hampshire to find an example.

4 Comments:

Blogger Al said...

Obama's definition of inclusive means excluding any Catholic priest/bishop to lead a prayer. Whatever the reason, at least it saves us the embarrassment of what kind of prayer the type of Catholic he would choose would say.

7:00 AM  
Blogger the Egyptian said...

would the majority of our Catholic Bishops be any different, Good Lord I am so tired of inclusiveness, Hell is very inclusive, just hope Satan has room for the whole works

9:48 AM  
Blogger Erin said...

Ladies and gentlemen of the Cave, I *am* Episcopalian (don't stone me, bro!), and I don't like this either.

When the Episcopal Church decided to consecrate Gene Robinson as Bishop, they made it very clear that this was "in spite of" not "because of" his choices in the bedroom. Yet in doing so, they set up a dynamic that was clearly unstable: a high level representative of the church living in a relationship that the church does not support, yet with the church's full knowledge and... support? They would neither condemn the bishop's choices nor change the rules-- for pity's sake, you don't even have to be Christian to do the math on that one!--and not surprisingly, it's resulting in schism which has literally divided families (my best friend's is one of them).

Now, on top of that, we see the original decision turned completely on its head, with Bishop Robinson being chosen for Inaugural duties specifically because he is openly gay, and in spite of his priesthood in the Christian church.

May God help me, but I'd like to think that any real American would bristle at being the target of such tokenism. I know Michelle Obama famously did in her senior paper, where she complained of always being seen as black first and a capable student second. Now they have propagated that very dynamic by making sure their invocator is gay first and a priest second.

May God help us all-- and thanks for letting me rant.

Erin

12:09 PM  
Blogger Vir Speluncae Orthodoxae said...

God will not bless a country that mocks Him.

2:50 PM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home