So This Is What A Man-Whore Looks Like
WARNING!! Harsh language alert!
Here's the entire article from CatholicCulture.com; (Emphasis and comments mine)
Archbishop Weakland admits relationships with several men, questions immorality of homosexual acts
In an interview with The New York Times, retired Archbishop Rembert Weakland admitted relationships with several men while he served as Archbishop of Milwaukee and questioned Catholic teaching on the immorality of homosexual acts. (In other words, he's a slut. And much like his series of bromances, he's now trying to stick it to The Church. What a guy.)
“If we say our God is an all-loving god,” the archbishop said, “how do you explain that at any given time probably 400 million living on the planet at one time would be gay? (If 400 million people choose evil, then there you go... I've just explained it to you. God is also an all-just God. We have the free will to make all sorts of choices. And the responsibility to live with the consequences of those choices.) Are the religions of the world, as does Catholicism, saying to those hundreds of millions of people, you have to pass your whole life without any physical, genital expression of that love?” (Here we go, it all comes down to his shit covered dick. How typical... how predictable.)
The Catechism of the Catholic Church (no. 2357) teaches:
Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered." They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.
The Catechism also identifies homosexual acts with “the sin of the Sodomites”-- one of the sins so grave as to cry to heaven for vengeance (nos. 1867; 2357, fn. 141). (Wow, "... for vengeance". Pretty powerful stuff.)
Archbishop Weakland also denounced the Church’s teaching-- repeated authoritatively in a 2003 document-- that homosexual inclinations are objectively disordered. “Those are bad words because they are pejorative,” he said. To someone who sucks dick, I would imagine he does finds that pejorative. Good.
WARNING!! Harsh language alert!
Here's the entire article from CatholicCulture.com; (Emphasis and comments mine)
In an interview with The New York Times, retired Archbishop Rembert Weakland admitted relationships with several men while he served as Archbishop of Milwaukee and questioned Catholic teaching on the immorality of homosexual acts. (In other words, he's a slut. And much like his series of bromances, he's now trying to stick it to The Church. What a guy.)
“If we say our God is an all-loving god,” the archbishop said, “how do you explain that at any given time probably 400 million living on the planet at one time would be gay? (If 400 million people choose evil, then there you go... I've just explained it to you. God is also an all-just God. We have the free will to make all sorts of choices. And the responsibility to live with the consequences of those choices.) Are the religions of the world, as does Catholicism, saying to those hundreds of millions of people, you have to pass your whole life without any physical, genital expression of that love?” (Here we go, it all comes down to his shit covered dick. How typical... how predictable.)
The Catechism of the Catholic Church (no. 2357) teaches:
Basing itself on Sacred Scripture, which presents homosexual acts as acts of grave depravity, tradition has always declared that "homosexual acts are intrinsically disordered." They are contrary to the natural law. They close the sexual act to the gift of life. They do not proceed from a genuine affective and sexual complementarity. Under no circumstances can they be approved.
The Catechism also identifies homosexual acts with “the sin of the Sodomites”-- one of the sins so grave as to cry to heaven for vengeance (nos. 1867; 2357, fn. 141). (Wow, "... for vengeance". Pretty powerful stuff.)
Archbishop Weakland also denounced the Church’s teaching-- repeated authoritatively in a 2003 document-- that homosexual inclinations are objectively disordered. “Those are bad words because they are pejorative,” he said.
7 Comments:
Reject Humanae Vitae and you raise the possibility of people, even an errant archbishop who should know better, finding rationales to justify immoral sexual activities. Of course we all know the extent to which the American Catholic hierarchy got solidly behind Pope Paul VI when he published HV.
Yes, and the CCC teaching that you have quoted still stands. The vengeance bit comes from Pope St. Pius X (that I know of) in his Catechism. The other 3 of the 4 sins crying out for vengeance (i.e., in addition to sodomy) are: willful murder, defrauding the laborer of his just wages, and oppression of the poor. The teaching on the 4 sins covers both social justice and personal sanctity.
Thank you Pope St. Pius X and Pope Paul VI. Thanks for nothin' Apb. Weakland.
It sure doesn't seem like this guy is doing penance and trting to keep his soul out of eternal hell fire. He continues to try to lead others astray! Dare we guess he works for the Prince of Lies? Our as Prevat2 would say, he's one of the twelfth of bishops who are the successors of Judas Iscariot.
"Bishop" (gag) Weakland (boy, is trhat name appropriate),
During all those years that you expressed your non-monogomous genital "love" (hardly!) by running your dick up another guy's rectum, did your vow of perpertual celibacy ever cross your mind? Or was that just a small obstacle for a three-alarm flamer such as yourself?
Nah, this isn't a man whore. This is the John of a man whore.
And yes Weakhead, the Church is saying no genital expression of that 'love'. What part of objective disorder and mortally sinful do you not understand? The whole thing apparently.
Well, gosh, Weakland, if I'm unmarried, does that mean I have to go my whole life "without any physical, genital expression of that love?"
Yes, it does.
Funny how that works. 10 Commandments, 7 deadly sins, 4 sins crying to heaven for vengeance...
Guess he forgot how to count, too. Jesus was a mean taskmaster when he said we have to pray for our enemies.
How did this man get $450,000 without anybody knowing about it?
He counter-sued someone who tried to get justice in the courts after being assaulted by one of his priests and losing.
What he did with his body is a non-issue compared with that.
Unfortunately, it doesn't surprise me that my former Archbishop just doesn't get it. He resigned in disgrace; his own monastery wouldn't take him back (and if you know anything about Benedictine life, that says a great deal; and now he publishes his memoirs, which will do nobody good, least of all himself...keep praying that he finally sees how foolish he's been.
More convo on this over at Badger Blogger:
http://badgerblogger.com/?p=12343#comment-215960
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home