Sunday, April 29, 2007

BOW TO YOUR SEN.SEI!
Fear (and common sense) does not exist in this dojo (or the Democratic Party)

Yesterday at the California Democratic Party Convention & Same Sex Orgy/Bake Sale, the political orgasm-of-the-moment, Sen(sei). Barack Hussein Obama, is still trying to legislate away terrorism.

His latest Polly-Anna pronouncement is that “we are now one signature away from ending this war.” Wow... I feel safer already. And I can just picture all those wacky Democrats running in a ring around Obama chanting "Kobra Kai! Kobra Kai!".

Yet again... The Caveman asks the musical question; if we leave Iraq right this moment, does that mean The War on Terror is over? Well, some people believe it. Small gullible children and Democrats, to name two.

But lo and behold, I stumble across this story (that for some odd reason, the same type of story that the MSM largely ignores);

US Troops Seize Gang 'Smuggling Bombs From Iran'

This report also stated that the very same Iranians are sending Iraqi militants to Iran for terrorist training. I wonder how much money Sensei Obama plans on throwing at this problem?

9 Comments:

Blogger Jeff Miller said...

Now if only we can get a non-binding resolution against al-quaida then terrorism is over.

Plus lets stop all support for those in poverty and pull out of all soup kitchens and the war on poverty will also be over.

12:35 PM  
Blogger Amy said...

The reason Democrats will never understand the war on terrorism, or terrorism in general, is that they are the party of no moral convictions or compass.

They do not believe in God or, if they do, their "God" is a wishy-washy, androgynous, feel-good spirit being who expects no sacrifice, no self-control, and no dedication to concrete moral principles.

Therefore, the Democrats cannot fathom the notion that there are people (read: radical Islamists) who are not only so grounded in their convictions they are willing to kill for them, they are also willing to die for them. They cannot fathom the notion that radical Islamists see themselves not as the end-all-be-all of existence, but that they (the radical Islamists) are slaves to Allah and doing Allah's will through Mohammed's teachings.

In short, Democrats do not take radical Islamists seriously, so they are blinded to the threat terrorism poses to the West (and, ironically, the "values" Democrats and liberals hold most dear - feminism, abortion, gay rights, etc. would all be verboten under radical Islam).

So blinded are the Democrats to this notion, that rather than face the real, true, enemy with the same brute force said enemy is willing to use against us they instead turn their sights towards combating the least harmless of all: Catholics and (conservative) Christians. They take us seriously because we're far more present than radical Islamists and (since they don't really believe radical Islamists are serious) fear that we will strip them of their beloved freedoms (abortion, gay rights, etc.) and impose a "theocracy" on America.

They see us as easy targets because we are not as agressive or violent as radical Islamists - we do not use car bombs, or behead people - therefore we must be pushovers. Because the Democrats (and liberals in general) dispise our conviction to the One True Faith, and because we are not inherently violent, they feel they can bully us out of existence.

Mind you, I'm no where near advocating we should remotely be like radical Islamists...but we need to be far more agressive in proclaiming our faith, fighting for it in the public square, and evangelizing our neighbors and our nation.

4:43 PM  
Blogger tara said...

If the Democrats take office, their "promises" will change. Unable to follow through with their outrageous claims--just bring our troops home, and everything will be OK?--they will blame the previous administration for their failures and WE will suffer the consequences of their dim-bulb realization--oh geez the terrorists are real.

12:30 PM  
Anonymous Tony said...

Yet again... The Caveman asks the musical question; if we leave Iraq right this moment, does that mean The War on Terror is over?

Of course it does. If I stick my head in the sand, it means that the predator that was chasing me trying to eat me disappears.

1:42 PM  
Blogger Winnipeg Catholic said...

I like Obama. I think he was spot on from the beginning. The USA was never ready to take on a middle eastern occupation because a middle eastern occupation involves elimination of all possible threats of any kind in order to be successful. In other words, we would have to become Saddam in order to occupy Iraq.

And who is there that is better than Obama from a traditional catholic perspective? Romney? Kucinich? I don't really see a good caveman catholic in the running.

I suppose Rudy might fit the bill. But he's been married a couple 'o times. A Roman Protestant indeed, he left the fold, right?

http://reform-catholic.blogspot.com/2007/04/prohibitionist-catholics-part-i.html

9:07 AM  
Blogger Vir Speluncae Catholicus said...

Rudy McRomney is a fraud. There three are fiscally conservative democrats, and that's where it ends.

Personally, I'd like to see Duncan Hunter or Tom Tancredo.... maybe even Sam Brownback ( a good Catholic boy). But as usual, the American people have an attention span as long as the most recent sound byte.

1:32 PM  
Blogger Winnipeg Catholic said...

Liberals complain that Obama is a 'political trad'

"In his view of history, in his respect for tradition, in his skepticism that the world can be changed any way but very, very slowly, Obama is deeply conservative. There are moments when he sounds almost Burkean. He distrusts abstractions, generalizations, extrapolations, projections. It’s not just that he thinks revolutions are unlikely: he values continuity and stability for their own sake, sometimes even more than he values change for the good. Take health care, for example. "If you're starting from scratch," he says, "then a single-payer system" — a government-managed system like Canada's, which disconnects health insurance from employment — "would probably make sense. But we’ve got all these legacy systems in place, and managing the transition, as well as adjusting the culture to a different system, would be difficult to pull off. So we may need a system that’s not so disruptive that people feel like suddenly what they’ve known for most of their lives is thrown by the wayside." -Larissa MacFarquhar's fine profile in the New Yorker

http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2007/05/07/070507fa_fact_macfarquhar?currentPage=1

3:13 PM  
Blogger Former Altar Boy said...

What about Obama's schooling in a madrassa (Muslim school) and his campaign's first denial, then begrudging asmission of that fact, which he now downplays whenever it comes up?

9:54 PM  
Blogger Winnipeg Catholic said...

LOL - Islam has a strict death policy for apostates. If Obama has publicly renounced Islam or embraced Christianity then Islam is a religion that would like to kill him. He has professed an affiliation with the UCC. So while he is protestant, he is no muslim.

7:25 AM  

Post a Comment

Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]

Links to this post:

Create a Link

<< Home