Utterly, Unquestionably And 100% Despicable
...And desperate
Yep, despicable and desperate. That pretty much describes Democrats. And as I re-read this article from Spero News, the word "vicious" comes to mind as well.
Here's some of the article; (Emphasis mine)Democratic bloggers claim Palin faked pregnancy
Democrats can't understand how a middle-aged woman can have both a career and a family, especially one that includes a baby with Down Syndrome
Progressive Democrats are speculating that Sarah Palin's four-month old son is really not hers. Democrats believe that Palin's 16 year-old daughter is the true mother of the boy.
Fueling the speculation was that the birth of the Down Syndrome baby, born April 18, 2008, was a surprise and even her staff were unaware she was pregnant until seven months into the pregnancy. Additionally, Palin's water broke one month before the baby was due yet she kept a speaking engagement in Texas then made the eight-hour flight to Alaska. Three days after the birth of Trig, Palin returned to work as Governor.
Democratic bloggers are pointing to a video (located at the end of this article) by Palin where she discusses motherhood in March 2008, weeks before her delivery but doesn't mention her pregnancy.
Hornrimsylvia, who blogs on the Progressive Democratic site "Daily Kos", believes the video shows that Palin's pregnancy was faked. "I have never seen a woman with an eight-month pregnancy be able to cross her legs and vigorously sit forward like that. Their backs are usually curved so far back that they need a pillow for lumbar support."
Cory Bantic agrees with the narrative that Palin put her career first with little regard for her family. "Putting a near-term baby at risk to give a speech is pretty unforgivable in my book," Bantic said. AustinCynic also believes Palin put her son's life at risk. "If that is true then it proves beyond doubt that Sarah Palin is a woman of catastrophically poor judgement"
A middle-aged woman who has a political career and made the decision to have a baby with Down Syndrome is difficult for many Democrats to accept and invites speculation.
Adept2u wants all bloggers to examine Palin more carefully. "It says different things to me if she faked her own pregnancy," Adept wrote, "One, she will institute a Christian Taliban here in America where women must be ashamed to be pregnant, yet forced to be pregnant at the same time. I have a 22 year-old daughter, no thank you to that. It also proves that she is a liar on the most basic human issues. She is accepting praise because at 44 she brought her baby to term, and looked just fabulous doing it. I'm not looking forward to leaping from 2008 to 1953, so if this is at all possible I want to hear about it."
GirlZero wrote, "Just what we need. Another Pro-Life Rethug who puts politics before their family's welfare and well-being. Nauseating." Tash123 wondered what shame Palin is trying to shield the true mother of the baby. "What is Palin ashamed of? Her daughter for getting pregnant? What does this say about her to her children and voters as far as owning up to their responsibilities? That is telling. Just saying." I still want to know what actual proof they have. But as I've pointed out before, Democrats really don't need proof. Guilt by shrill accusation works just fine for them.
...And desperate
Yep, despicable and desperate. That pretty much describes Democrats. And as I re-read this article from Spero News, the word "vicious" comes to mind as well.
Here's some of the article; (Emphasis mine)
Democrats can't understand how a middle-aged woman can have both a career and a family, especially one that includes a baby with Down Syndrome
Progressive Democrats are speculating that Sarah Palin's four-month old son is really not hers. Democrats believe that Palin's 16 year-old daughter is the true mother of the boy.
Fueling the speculation was that the birth of the Down Syndrome baby, born April 18, 2008, was a surprise and even her staff were unaware she was pregnant until seven months into the pregnancy. Additionally, Palin's water broke one month before the baby was due yet she kept a speaking engagement in Texas then made the eight-hour flight to Alaska. Three days after the birth of Trig, Palin returned to work as Governor.
Democratic bloggers are pointing to a video (located at the end of this article) by Palin where she discusses motherhood in March 2008, weeks before her delivery but doesn't mention her pregnancy.
Hornrimsylvia, who blogs on the Progressive Democratic site "Daily Kos", believes the video shows that Palin's pregnancy was faked. "I have never seen a woman with an eight-month pregnancy be able to cross her legs and vigorously sit forward like that. Their backs are usually curved so far back that they need a pillow for lumbar support."
Cory Bantic agrees with the narrative that Palin put her career first with little regard for her family. "Putting a near-term baby at risk to give a speech is pretty unforgivable in my book," Bantic said. AustinCynic also believes Palin put her son's life at risk. "If that is true then it proves beyond doubt that Sarah Palin is a woman of catastrophically poor judgement"
A middle-aged woman who has a political career and made the decision to have a baby with Down Syndrome is difficult for many Democrats to accept and invites speculation.
Adept2u wants all bloggers to examine Palin more carefully. "It says different things to me if she faked her own pregnancy," Adept wrote, "One, she will institute a Christian Taliban here in America where women must be ashamed to be pregnant, yet forced to be pregnant at the same time. I have a 22 year-old daughter, no thank you to that. It also proves that she is a liar on the most basic human issues. She is accepting praise because at 44 she brought her baby to term, and looked just fabulous doing it. I'm not looking forward to leaping from 2008 to 1953, so if this is at all possible I want to hear about it."
GirlZero wrote, "Just what we need. Another Pro-Life Rethug who puts politics before their family's welfare and well-being. Nauseating." Tash123 wondered what shame Palin is trying to shield the true mother of the baby. "What is Palin ashamed of? Her daughter for getting pregnant? What does this say about her to her children and voters as far as owning up to their responsibilities? That is telling. Just saying."
posted by Kevin Whiteman at
6:37 AM
5 Comments:
Oh, Cavey, this isn't guilt by association. It's guilt by innuendo. Worse, in my book.
Of course, if she'd aborted the kid, they'd be happy.
Demonstrating that when a group of people celebrates as a right the killing of children by sucking their brains out of their skulls as they're being born, there are no depths to which they will not sink.
Oh no, Paul! I said guilt by accusation, not association.
But no big deal... we're in complete agreement that the Defeatocrats are pretty much pond-scum.
It appeared as though Mr. Biden may have tried to hide that smootcheroo...Look at it again. Or he coulda been thinkin..."Gee, she don't even smootch me like that!"
Ahem....Defeatocrats, you might want to look in the mirror your hostility is showing!
Just exactly what credibility do these repugnent family haters have to be saying that Palin is irresponsible. Good Grief!
Huh! I'm 7 months pregnant and everyone says I look the same as I always have. I'm still wearing all of my normal clothes ~ including pants and even my jackets. And if a woman has a non-eventful vaginal birth why can't she be up and moving in a few days? Sure, she might not be able to jog five miles (or maybe she can??) but why can't she stand and talk? Do people think that giving birth is always some kind of horrific process by which the woman ends up bed-ridden for months???
God bless that little Down Syndrom baby!! He just might end up being a living Saint depending on if he still cannot tell right from wrong when he reaches adulthood! Talk about having a blessed household!
Post a Comment
Subscribe to Post Comments [Atom]
<< Home