Finally - The Obama Definition Of "Hope"
He talks about "hope" an awful lot... but what exactly does he mean?
Yes, yes... we've all heard Obama go on and on about that elusive thing called hope. But none of us have heard yet what hope means, specifically. As I heard a political pundit state the other day; Hope never balanced a budget. Hope never fought radical Islamic terrorists."
In the HOPE that abortion on demand is kept legal, even if it means killing a child who has survived the abortion procedure. Here are Obama's 10 reasons for supporting infanticide.
In the HOPE that terrorists never attack America again... he didn't even bother to vote on legislation that would expand law enforcement's ability to intercept international phone calls and e-mails from suspected terrorists. I HOPE no one ever accuses Obama of "failing to connect the dots" like everyone did pre-9/11.
Yet again, in the HOPE that terrorist never attack America again, Obama's master strategy is to double foreign aid to $50 billion a year. Obama has yet to explain where the additional $25 billion would come from. I HOPE he finds it.
Hold on... I HOPE I just found out how The Empty One will pay for all that money thrown at terrorists so they won't attack us. Tax evil corporations even more than the government already does!
And if anyone should happen to doubt why I look upon Barack Hussein Obama as a world class fraud, I HOPE you just look at his voting record. You'll clearly see why he was voted the most liberal member of the US Senate.
I have to admit I have grown frustrated with the news media's reporting on Obama. Even Fox news seems enamored by this man. Yet, he voted against the born alive act. How the heck could any decent human do that?
ReplyDeleteYep - be fully prepared for him to be the next President.
ReplyDeleteHeaven help us all.
You know it is interesting if you follow his logic regarding the Born Alive Act. It is pretty much exactly correct and a good argument for Pro-Lifers...I know what you're thinking but follow me for one second.
ReplyDeleteObama: If I vote for the born alive act and allow children who 'should have been aborted' to live and spend thousands upon thousands of dollars helping them to keep the child alive- despite its ability to ask for anything on its own- then I must conclude that it is being treated as if I was near death.
Obama: I am fully human.
Obama: If I am fully human and I would be treated the same as this child who would otherwise die, then the child must be fully human and must have the same rights as me.
Obama: If this child cannot survive on its own, it is no different than a child in a mother's womb.
Obama: If a child in the mother's womb is the same as the child who survived abortion, then the child in the mother's womb should have the same rights as me.
Obama: If the unborn child has the same rights as me, then I must also be against abortion.
Obama: I'm against abortion, so I must be against the Born Alive Act.
It is very simple if p, then q logic and he knows that if he is for the Born Alive Act, he must be against abortion. You can't have one without the other and Obama has proven that!!!
I'm sure you all followed this, but I wanted to clarify Obama's last step in logic:
ReplyDeleteObama: But I'm for abortion, so I must be against the Born Alive Act.
Great logic! Wrong conclusion!